Mac vs pc for video editing 2017 upgrade#
Mac vs pc for video editing 2017 portable#
Mac vs pc for video editing 2017 pro#
Mac vs pc for video editing 2017 Bluetooth#

In passing, £1,429 also happens to be the price of a 21.5in iMac with a Retina 4K display, 3GHz quad-core i5-7400, 16GB of memory, and Radeon Pro 555 graphics with 2GB video memory.Īlso, Apple sometimes has good deals on refurbished Macs. Note that a three-year AppleCore Plan for the 13.3in MacBook Pro costs £229, and £329 for the 15in. However, it does get you a usable MacBook for less than £1,500 instead of £1,900 or £2,700. There’s also the annoyance of having four Thunderbolt 3 ports, so any peripherals you already own – such as USB hard drives – will need adaptor cables. The major limitations with the 13.3in MacBook Pro include the lack of a dedicated graphics card, the lack of a quad-core processor option, and its inability to handle 32GB of memory. You should switch to the 15in MacBook Pro with a 2.2GHz quad-core i7 for £1,899 instead.

Mac vs pc for video editing 2017 upgrade#

However, it’s not worth paying an extra £270 to upgrade the Core i5 to a dual-core Core i7, which would bring the price up to £1,699. If you go for a 13.3in MacBook Pro, you should pay £180 to double the RAM to 16GB, because the integrated graphics will consume main memory. The processor drops from a 2.9GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 to a 2.3GHz dual-core Core i5, the 512GB SSD drops to 128GB, and the screen resolution drops from 2880 x 1800 pixels to 2560 x 1600 pixels. (Ask your university about student discounts.) However, switching to a 13.3in MacBook Pro involves sacrifices. Professional photo editors often buy the top-end 15in MacBook Pro, but it’s not really worth £2,699 for student use. In fact, you should add those to any laptop used for sustained work.

Mac vs pc for video editing 2017 Bluetooth#

You will need to add a Type cover, and I’d recommend buying a good USB keyboard and a Bluetooth mouse as well.

Mac vs pc for video editing 2017 portable#

You can get an extremely portable system with a great screen, an Intel Core i7, 16GB of memory and a 512GB SSD for a student price of £1,329.30. If you really want a pen, Microsoft’s Surface Pro 4 is your best bet. Some photographers like to use high-resolution pens – as supplied with Microsoft Surfaces and Apple iPad Pros – and some like Wacom tablets, but many others just use mice. Touch-screens are handy for fat-finger navigation, but they don’t add anything for photo-editing purposes. There are advantages to being part of the majority.

However, it would be worth knowing how many of your fellow students use each system. In general, I recommend that people stick to what they know, because it takes a long time to become proficient in a new operating system. These run on both PCs and Macs, so you have a choice.

Photography students typically use Adobe’s Creative Cloud suite, mainly Photoshop and Lightroom. A refurbished ThinkPad X1 Carbon would be a good portable option with a good quality screen. It might be better to buy a really good desktop and a cheap laptop. They can also handle more memory, bigger hard drives and faster graphics cards, and they are easier to upgrade. Desktop PCs can run hotter, faster processors than laptops. Note that a good desktop will always beat a good laptop. In providing more time for experiments, fast PCs can actually lead to better results. Cheaper machines can do the job, but reducing processing times from, say, 30 minutes to three minutes makes a huge difference to workflows. Professional photo and video editors typically go for the most powerful machines they can afford, with prices ranging from about £1,500 to £3,000. Last week’s column covered the needs of a history student, who wanted a laptop costing up to £500. Do I have to get a Mac or is Windows a good option? Aileen I have a high-spec but old Toshiba Portégé that has served me well, but I’m starting an art course and will study photography so need a top-notch screen (perhaps touch screen?) and more processing power.